Mold is ubiquitous and exposure to mold products of metabolism is unavoidable, whether indoors or outdoors. Mold can produce a variety of adverse health outcomes by four scientifically validated pathophysiologic mechanisms: hypersensitivity, toxicity, infection, and irritation.
These symptoms also can be compared with those caused by the application of certain vaccines.
April 2000, a new syndrome was reported in children with autism who exhibited developmental regression and gastrointestinal symptoms by the Japanese researcher Kawashima. We knew this would generate debate in the political, medical, and pharmacological establishments.
During our investigation of the man-made cause of autism, we read about the retraction of an article, published on February 28, 1998, in The Lancet by Dr. A. J. Wakefield, entitled:
‘Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children.’
Precisely at that moment, we (Wolff Geisler, Joel Savage, and Johan van Dongen, authors of this blog) are at war against the medical and pharmacological establishments because they have caused pain, sickness, and death to more people. You’ll only know this if you are working in the medical field.
There is a program called ‘Depopulation’ sponsored by the rich people who think some people have to die to save the overpopulated world. This has brought corruption within the medical establishments leading to many diseases, including Aids and Ebola.
While many don’t care because the poor or the Third World only suffers, we want to remind everyone that the corrupt medical institutions gradually profit from advanced countries too. The reason diseases commonly found in the Third World are emerging in the advanced world. The reason vaccines are contaminated resulting in many birth defects, cancer, and other new diseases.
For example, Aids was to depopulate Africa but is now a global issue. Nobody wants to retaliate or seek justice for this medical genocide, yet thousands of people are dying every day globally. What kind of world are we living in?
The fact that people are easily fooled and deceived than convinced, the medical establishments, including WHO and CDC, are seen as ‘Saviour,’ and those fighting to create a healthy environment are seen as enemies.
In reality, light always overcomes darkness so we will continue to fight those corrupt medical establishments and we know we shall win when they have no more space to accommodate the lies.
The onset of behavioral symptoms was associated, by the parents, with measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination. Many children had intestinal abnormalities, ranging from lymphoid nodular hyperplasia to aphthoid ulceration.
Histology showed patchy chronic inflammation in the colon and reactive ileal lymphoid hyperplasia. Also, behavioral disorders included autism, disintegrative psychosis, and possible postviral or vaccinal encephalitis was observed.
Furthermore, abnormal laboratory results were significantly raised urinary methylmalonic acid compared with age-matched controls, low hemoglobin, and a low serum IgA was also found in children.
But as far as the retraction of Andrew Wakefield’s article by The Lancet is concerned he is both revered and reviled. To a small group of parents, he’s a hero who won’t back down from his assertion that the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine can cause autism.
“Age at First Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccination in Children With Autism. CDC also shares with parents and others their great concern about the number of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder ASD. CDC is committed to continuing to provide essential data on autism, search for factors that put children at risk for autism, and look for possible causes.”
But from 2004 up till now, the only thing CDC did was to cover up the real cause of autism and many other diseases like Aids, Ebola, Nodding Syndrome, and Breast Cancer in Africa, caused by mycotoxins and vaccines. The medical world is so corrupt that we wonder what kind of heart is embedded in the chest because it seems they kill for pleasure or profit.
Statement from Dr. Andrew Wakefield
Regarding UK News stories/MMR/Wakefield/Lancet 22 February 2004
“Serious allegations have been made against me and my colleagues in relation to the provision of clinical care for children with autism and bowel disease, and the subsequent reporting of their disease.
These allegations have been made by journalist Brian Deer who has expressed, in front of witnesses, his aim of destroying me.
All but one of the allegations, which are grossly defamatory, have been shown to be baseless. One allegation remains against me personally.
That is, that I did not disclose to the Lancet that a minority of the 12 children in the 1998 Lancet report were also part of a quite separate study that was funded in part by the Legal Aid Board.
It is the Lancet’s opinion but not mine that such disclosure should have been made since it may have been perceived as a conflict of interest. This is despite the fact that the funding was provided for a separate scientific study.
It needs to be made clear that the funds from the Legal Aid Board were not used for the 1998 Lancet study, and therefore I perceived that no financial conflict of interest existed.
The Lancet defines a conflict of interest as anything that might embarrass the author if it were to be revealed later. I am not embarrassed since it is a matter of fact that there was no conflict of interest. I am, however, dismayed at the way these facts have been misrepresented.
Whether or not the children’s parents were pursuing, or intended to pursue litigation against the vaccine manufacturers, had no bearing on any clinical decision in relation to these children, or their inclusion in the Lancet 1998 report.
It is a matter of fact that there was no conflict of interest at any time in relation to the medical referral of these children, their clinical investigation and care, and the subsequent reporting of their disease in the Lancet.
As far as the 1998 Lancet report is concerned, it is a matter of fact that we found and reported inflammation in the intestines of these children.
The grant of £55,000 was paid not to me but to the Royal Free Hospital Special Trustees for my research group to conduct studies on behalf of the Legal Aid Board. These research funds were properly administered through the Royal Free Hospital Special Trustees.
The Legal Aid research grant to my group was used exclusively for the purpose of conducting an examination of any possible connection between the component viruses of the MMR – particularly measles virus – and the bowel disease in these children.
This is entirely in line with other studies that have been funded by the Legal Aid Board (latterly the Legal Services Commission) and reported in the BMJ. If and when this work is finally published, a due acknowledgment will be made of all sources of funding.
It is unfortunate that, following full disclosure of these facts to the editor of the Lancet, he stated that in retrospect he would not have published facts pertinent to the parent’s perceived association with MMR vaccine in the 1998 Lancet report.
Such a position has major implications for the scientific investigation of injuries that might be caused by drugs or vaccines, such as Gulf War Syndrome and autism, where possible victims may be seeking medical help and also legal redress.
Health Secretary John Reid has called for a public inquiry. I welcome this since I have already called for a public inquiry that addresses the whole issue in relation to vaccines and autism.
It has been proposed that my role in this matter should be investigated by the General Medical Council (GMC). I not only welcome this, but I also insist on it and I will be making contact with the GMC personally, in the forthcoming week.
This whole unpleasant episode has been conflated to provide those opposed to addressing genuine concerns about vaccine safety with an opportunity of attacking me – an attack that is out of all proportion to the facts of the matter.
I stand by everything that I have done in relation to the care, investigation, and reporting of the disease that I and my colleagues have discovered in these desperately ill children.
My family and I have suffered many setbacks as a direct consequence of this work. As a family, we consider that our problems are nothing compared with the suffering of these children and their families. For the sake of these children, this work will continue.”
Gastroenterologist Dr. Andrew Wakefield never committed any fraud, and his study in The Lancet linking the MMR vaccine for measles, mumps, and rubella to novel bowel disease and autism has repeatedly been affirmed as accurate in the years following its forced retraction.
Several years after Dr. Wakefield’s study was forcibly retracted from The Lancet on orders from the UK government, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention senior scientist Dr. William Thompson co-authored a study published in the peer-reviewed journal Pediatrics that was meant to counter it. The premise of this study basically maintains that MMR is safe and effective for children.
Opinion of the writers of this blog
Often the pharmaceutical, political, medical, and military establishments tell us that we lack absence of evidence. But dear establishments this does not mean evidence of absence.
As soon as you look at all huge percentages of iatrogenic diseases with control groups, for instance, UNVACCINATED children, then you’ll know for sure.