Design a site like this with
Get started

Science reappraisal of HIV-Aids hypothesis


In every profession, education is involved to be perfect and accurate in our services but after school, most people become rogues, thieves, liars, corrupt, hypocrites, and criminals. Corruption reigns everywhere including the pharmaceutical companies.

Even information about certain diseases such as Aids and Ebola provided on the websites of the WHO and CDC is even false.

The reason a Dutch scientist/microsurgeon called Johan Van Dongen, and a Belgian-African journalist, Joel Savage, launched this new health blog. Later, a German medical doctor named Dr. Wolff Geisler whose articles have also played a significant role on this blog also joined us.

Not long thereafter we came across a famous anti-HIV theory dissident Canadian Biologist Dr. David Crowe. It was on Saturday, August 6, 2016, when David interviewed Joel Savage on Aids and Ebola: Infectious Myth.

David Crowe interviews Joel Savage especially on AIDS and Ebola, and the dark role of Belgium in African history. Although Joel has worked with a scientist and medical investigative journalist Johan van Dongen on the theory that HIV and Ebola viruses are laboratory engineered, David is skeptical of this theory, not accepting that there is any evidence the viruses exist, it is still an interesting discussion.

David Crowe and his thousands of companions

In 1991, we, the Group for the Scientific Reappraisal of the HIV/AIDS Hypothesis, became dissatisfied with the state of the evidence that the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) did, in fact, cause AIDS.

According to David Crowe and many others, the Aids industry and media want us to think there are only a handful of scientists who doubt the HIV-AIDS theory. But here is the reality.

The 3.269 doubters of the official HIV-AIDS theory

Specifically, all those doubters and amongst them famous scientists have proposed that researchers independent of the HIV establishment should audit the Centers for Disease Control’s records of AIDS cases, bearing in mind that the correlation of HIV with AIDS, upon which the case for HIV causation rests, is itself an artifact of the definition of AIDS.

Since 1985, exactly the same diseases or conditions have been defined as “AIDS” when antibodies are present, and as “non-AIDS” when HIV and antibodies are absent.

Independent professional groups such as the Society of Actuaries should be invited to nominate members for an independent commission to investigate the following question:

How frequently do AIDS-defining diseases (or low T cell counts) occur in the absence of HIV? Until we have a definition of AIDS that is independent of HIV, the supposed correlation of HIV and AIDS is mere tautology.

Other independent researchers should examine the validity of the so-called “AIDS tests,” especially when these tests are used in Africa and Southern Asia, to see if they reliably record the presence of antibodies, let alone live and replicating virus.

The bottom line is this: the skeptics are eager to see the results of independent scientific testing. Those who uphold the HIV “party line” have so far refused. We object.

We have often been asked by both supporters and skeptics of the HIV=AIDS dogma what are the best technical papers describing the deficits of the dogma that HIV causes immune suppression that causes AIDS and then rapidly death, that AIDS drugs are the only hope, that HIV is sexually transmitted and so on.

We failed miserably. We could not possibly keep this list to just ten papers. There are simply too many papers that compellingly illustrate why the HIV=AIDS theory needs to be rethought. Or, maybe it was never thought through from the very beginning. Rethinking is not needed – just thinking.

Here then, are our ‘Top Ten’. We have made each paper available online via a link for personal research purposes only – so that skeptics of skeptics can verify that these papers really do show what I say they do.

Interview with David Crow on Belgium’s dark political history in Africa, Aids, and Ebola at PRN FM: Progressive Radio Network

“Why are there still statues of King Leopold of Belgium who killed a similar number of Africans as Hitler killed Jews? And is the west really helping Africa when it comes to diseases, or just using the perceived hopelessness for profit?” Asked David Crowe.

Even though David Crowe like many others is unaware that Aids, Ebola, etc, were man-made diseases, we were still interested in posting this interview on our blog.

Biography of David Crowe

David Crowe graduated in Biology and Mathematics from a Canadian University in the late 1970s. His thesis about two plant species hybridizing into a third crystallized his awareness that even the concept of “species”, the foundation of his chosen field of taxonomy, was imprecise and somewhat arbitrary.

Later he became fascinated by questions about whether HIV really did cause AIDS and, later, about whether HIV even existed. This led him to investigate several other disease paradigms, finding that in every case there was an environmental explanation that was more compelling than the official dogma.

With a high-tech day job, he was able to pursue his scientific interests without fear of losing a position, the ability to publish, or the ability to get grants. Not being able to reach behind the safety of a Ph.D., David simply uses his mammoth research database to put the data in front of you, so that you have the tools you need to decide whether well establish disease dogmas, and other scientific sureties, are really as solid as we are told.

David hails from Calgary in Canada and is rarely caught on the front side of a camera, but often on the back.

Link to the full radio interview:

Why are many tuberculosis patients in Africa often diagnosed with Aids?

The Aids virus

Certain contaminated medicines to treat tuberculosis patients in Africa caused Aids 

Diseases associated with an immune deficiency can be categorized. It involves an immune deficiency or either cellular immunity or hypersensitivity.

Human beings, especially those with no other deficiency, are susceptible to pyogenic infection. Usually, humans can cope in a normal manner with viral and fungal infections.

However, in contrast, a patient with a cellular deficiency hypersensitivity following polio- and cowpox vaccination are particularly prone to certain bacterial, viral, and protozoal infections caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis TB.

And then the pharmaceutical disease-producing factories appear by using deadly toxic agents such as Isoniazid, produced by Teva Netherlands BV, and Sulfadiazide, produced by Pfizer.

Tuberculosis is a chronic infectious disease that generally affects the lungs. The causing agent tubercle bacilli are mostly passed on from person to person through coughing of droplets from the respiratory tract (lungs), and can also be transmitted to the skin and eyes of people in the immediate vicinity. Tubercles also can penetrate the body through drinking.

In Africa tuberculosis and HIV go hand in hand, but the mass spread of tuberculosis infections in Africa are not caused by HIV or AIDS infection at all. The increase in the number of Africa TB patients is a result of the intended spread of special tuberculosis agents treated with Sulfadiozanide and Isoniazid which causes Aids!

Both agents will be thoroughly discussed in the next article, entitled: “Pharmaceutical Disease Producing Factories, Using Isoniazid And Sulfadiazide,” a very tough publication of which will force you to read.

Tubercles can nowadays be successfully and completely cured by the use of Isoniazid and Sulfadiazide. But that is the cover-up because both agents cause hundreds of new diseases as we will describe within the next mentioned article. Because both agents heal tuberculosis almost 100%, Africans think it’s very good medicine indeed, but these agents are Trojan Horses in sheep’s clothing.

The discovery of HIV antibodies after tuberculosis, polio- and cowpox vaccinations, carried out on African children by the Pasteur Institute of France, gave birth to various diseases including venereal disease, which was never exposed to the media and the literary world the way they should be.

After the children’s vaccination against tuberculosis in Uganda, Kenya, and Zimbabwe by Institute Pasteur, there was a very serious side effect, because the vaccine was contaminated, drastically affecting the Ugandan government. Scientists who observed this reported on this issue; “In Weekly Topic 1991 March 8: 1(col. 1-6)”.

Above all, after a huge increase in tuberculosis among children occurred and was treated with Isoniazid and Sulfadiazide, it is very remarkable these infections only occur in children under nine years! Not ten years! For their age group, from 1983 to 1986, tuberculosis increased significantly by 432 percent in Africa.

Hospitals, including Mbare Hospital in Harare, were suddenly full of tuberculosis patients, and also suffering from venereal diseases at the same time, as a side effect consequence, because Isoniazid and Sulfadiazide made them susceptible to the diseases. It is obvious that Isoniazid and Sulfadiazide are the cause of these venereal diseases because it appears in almost all infected children under the age of ten.

Curiously, it is mainly children who were sick, while about half of all juvenile patients developed antibodies against the HIV virus in their blood. It is also astonishing that children without any sexual experience suffered from venereal diseases.

Even more astonishing is the fact that these results are indicated by the World Health Organization in a Weekly Epidemic Record in 1992. The Centers for Disease Controls as well in the USA reported and listed the relationship between Aids and tuberculosis.

The virus of HIV provable in many places since 1959

HIV viruses

78 million people have become infected with HIV virus since the start of the epidemic

The evidence of HIV, respectively of the original EIAV, with or without Aids diseases, was demonstrated, for instance, in 1959 in Manchester, 1959 in Zaire, 1966 in Ivory Coast, and 1967 in Nigeria and Gabon.

In 1968, it was provable in St. Louis, 1968 in Venezuela, 1971-1972, in 45 out of 1,129 blood samples of heroin users in the USA, 1970 in two samples out of 850 in Kinshasa, 1973 in 50 out of 75 blood samples in the West Nile, Uganda, 1976 in 5 out of 695 in Zaire.

In the Central African Republic was 1976, and the evidence of STLV-III (= SIV mac= HTLV-IV) in monkeys was in 1961. HTLV -III respectively HIV was identified in leukemia patients in Italy, in a hemophilia patient in South Africa, in a 73-year-old Kaposi’s sarcoma in Greece without any indication of infection.

In New York, it was in 7% of leukemia patients, and in Belgium 3.4% of hemophilia patients who had only been given Belgian serum-concentrate which could not have contained HIV; in persons in France not belonging to ‘high-risk groups’ in a blood-donor in 1979 in Israel.

In 15% of cancer patients in Milan, who was on more likely to infect themselves as the leukemia patients of New York. These examples illustrate that agents of persistent acquired immunodeficiencies were already existing prior to the mass diseases today.

And that they are existing without connection with the Aids frequencies, especially in hemophilia and blood-cancer patients. The diseases occurred in random instances and in clusters.

A dinosaur egg with an embryo inside discovered in China

Lida Xing/University of Birmingham/AFP/East News

It is specified that the fossil was discovered in the southern part of China by British, Canadian, and Chinese researchers more than 20 years ago, but then it was simply put aside for storage.

Only 15 years later, during construction work at the Natural History Museum of Stone in Guangzhou, scientists noticed this find.

The embryo was named Baby Yingliang. Its length, together with the tail, is approximately 27 cm, and the egg itself is 15 cm long.

Using scanning technology, scientists will be able to recreate the body of an embryo. This lizard-like dinosaur, belonging to the genus oviraptor, was found to have small feathers similar to chicken plumage.

Thanks to a well-preserved embryo, researchers will be able to answer any questions about the growth and reproduction of dinosaurs. The unusual find is published in iScience.

Was Jesus Christ Truly born on Christmas Day – December 25?

Jesus walking on the sea

There are many questions about the scriptures in the Holy Bible than answers. Many times people do ask who had a camera to snap Jesus for us to see him today in thousands of Christian religious magazines, as a white man with a beard and long hair. And another intriguing question is “was Jesus Christ the Savior, actually born on Christmas Day, which is December 25?

Christmas Day, which falls on December 25 in every calendar year is an important occasion observed worldwide. This may be the fact that on December 25, the entire Catholic and most of the Protestant celebrate the Nativity of Christ, while on January 7, the Orthodox and a small part of the Protestant celebrate the Nativity of Christ. But the important question is why this division?

An excerpt from the Catholic Encyclopedia, reveals that “Christmas was not among the feasts of the early church. The word ‘Christmas’ comes from the word ‘Christ-Mass,’ that is to say ‘Mass to Christ.’ Therefore, it is very likely that because of Christ’s mass dedication by the Catholic, it eventually became a holiday, observed today as Christmas.

However, until the third century AD, no Christian church celebrated this event, and in the Bible, religious historians did not find it anywhere that Christ was born on December 25 or people observed the birth of Christ. Another important question comes, “So why did the Catholics choose December 25 as the birthday of Jesus Christ?

What has been recorded in the bible long before the birth of Christ are some prophecies, for example:“

And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; he will crush your head, and you will strike his heel.” At Genesis 3:15

 “I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse, and all peoples on earth will be blessed through you.” At Genesis 12:3

 “Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign: The virgin will conceive and give birth to a son, and will call him Immanuel.” At Isaiah 7:14

“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.” And this found in Micah 5:2

Yet, nothing is mentioned in them that Christ was to be born on Christmas day or December 25. However, in those days Caesar Augustus issued a decree that a census should be taken of the entire Roman world, forcing everyone to their town to register.

 Joseph, therefore, went up from the town of Nazareth in Galilee to Judea, then to Bethlehem the town of David, because he belonged to the house and line of David. He went there to register with Mary, who was pledged to be married to him and was expecting a child.

While they were there, the time came for the baby to be born, and she gave birth to her firstborn, a son. She wrapped him in cloths and placed him in a manger because there was no guest room available for them and shepherds were living out in the fields nearby, keeping watch over their flocks at night.

An angel of the Lord appeared to them, and the glory of the Lord shone around them, and they were terrified but the angel said to them, “Do not be afraid. I bring you good news that will cause great joy for all the people. Today in the town of David a Savior has been born to you; he is the Messiah, the Lord. This will be a sign to you: You will find a baby wrapped in cloths and lying in a manger.”

According to the story, the shepherds were tending their sheep in the fields near Bethlehem, when an Angel came to them. It wasn’t mentioned that the shepherds were tending their sheep in the fields in winter. Winter starts in December, throughout February and these months are very cold.

So from this short article, which was written by the religious research I made, everyone can convincingly agree that our savior Jesus Christ wasn’t born on Christmas Day or December 25.