Emails of the Centers for Disease Control reveal a culture of deep corruption and scientific dishonesty. Therefore, we provide you with a look at some internal correspondence regarding vaccine studies which should clear things up for you.
First of all, there is an extensive email correspondence which is the subject of a recent exposure by Vera Sharav from the World Mercury Project, led by Robert F. Kennedy which shows just how far officials at the CDC will go to shield vaccines and recommend childhood vaccination schedule.
According to this email exchange, several of the doctors involved in specific studies acknowledged that the vaccination schedule in the U.S. exposes American black babies to a higher thimerosal dose than European babies. In fact, the white Danish babies used in the study got seventy-five percent less thimerosal than black American babies.
In a 2014 review, independent scientists who took a closer look at the six studies the CDC often cites as evidence supporting the safety of vaccines were published in the journal Biomed Research International. In the study, researchers listed 165 other studies that refute the notion that thimerosal is safe.
Sixteen of these studies looked specifically at the effects thimerosal can have on infants and children, finding deaths, malformations, neurodevelopmental disorders including autism, developmental delays, and allergic reactions.
CDC director Brenda Fitzgerald forced to resign
This type of corruption isn’t a one-off incident that happened years ago; in fact, this behavior continues to this day. A short time ago CDC director Brenda Fitzgerald was forced to resign after it was discovered that she owns shares in vaccine manufacturer Merck, erasing any lingering doubts anyone might have had about whether or not the government agency has a vested interest in promoting vaccines.
Vera Sharav exposed the complex and widespread corruption that exists in the vaccination program, the deceptive practices by officials of authoritative international public health institutions, and further evidence of the callous disregard for the plight of thousands of children and young adults who suffer irreversible harm.
Moreover, the internal correspondence between CDC officials and the authors of the Danish epidemiological studies reveals a culture of corruption. CDC officials are intent on shielding vaccines and the childhood vaccination schedule at any cost; including outsourcing dubious epidemiological studies that have no relevance to the vaccination exposure of U.S. children.
These documents confirm that CDC and its commissioned scientists resorted to all manner of subterfuge and deception, in their concerted effort to subvert bona fides safety assessments.
Dr. Edward Yazbak, a pediatrician, referred to CDC’s epidemiological studies as just a distraction. They hope to bury evidence of the dangers of vaccines. At the same time, they have waged a misinformation campaign in making claims that skyrocketing Autism/ASD rates are due to better diagnostics.
An email exchange between Dr. Verstraeten, Dr. Chen, and Dr. Elisabeth Miller, a consultant epidemiologist to the WHO, who previously headed the UK Immunisation Department for fifteen years, discussed the national differences in infants’ exposure to thimerosal.
They all acknowledged that the U.S. vaccination schedule exposes American black infants to much higher doses of thimerosal than babies in Europe, including the U.K. They further acknowledged that Danish babies’ exposure to thimerosal does not come close to the exposure of U.S. Babies, Danish babies received 75% less thimerosal than U. S. babies.
That difference in exposure to mercury-laced vaccines renders the Danish studies non-comparable to U.S. children, and, therefore of no value toward ascertaining the risk posed by thimerosal-laced vaccines.
CDC officials disregarded the incompatibility of Danish vs. U.S. infants’ exposure to 75% higher doses of thimerosal; despite the incongruity, they chose Denmark as a population study comparator.
Furthermore, CDC officials selected a Danish network of scientists who were either employed by the Danish vaccine manufacturer, Statens Serum Institut SSI, or worked at institutions closely connected to SSI, such as the Danish Epidemiology Science Center, and Aarhus University. The details of how the studies’ results were premeditated are revealed in internal CDC email correspondence.
Because of all these scientific criminal activities, the Danish studies were crafted to deliver “proof of innocence” to offset Dr. Verstraeten’s evidence documenting a disturbing Thimerosal-autism risk; and they were crafted to refute Dr. Wakefield’s suggestion of an autism-MMR connection.
Despite all scientific evidence, CDC officials disregarded the scientific reservations about comparing “apples to pears”. Dr. Verstraeten expressed concern about scientific dishonesty in an email which he wrote to Harvard professor, Dr. Philippe Grandjean, an expert in heavy metals toxicity, to Dr. Chen, DeStefano, and four other CDC scientists in which he stated: “Many experts looking at this thimerosal issue, do not seem bothered to compare apples to pears.”
I do not wish to be the advocate of the anti-vaccine lobby and sound like being convinced that thimerosal is or was harmful, but at least I feel we should use sound scientific argumentation and not let our standards be dictated by our desire to disprove an unpleasant theory.”
After this contact CDC officials sought to obtain reports that would provide the appearance of scientific evidence that thimerosal, the mercury-based vaccine additive is safe, the MMR is safe, and that vaccines do not cause autism.
No less than Dr. Diane Simpson, a high-ranking CDC official, tasked with obtaining proof to offset Dr. Verstraeten’s demonstrated thimerosal-autism risk, traveled to Denmark in 2001 where she met with a network of Danish scientists.
CDC provided tens of millions of dollars in grants to a Danish team at the University of Aarhus in Denmark; the management of the grants was entrusted to psychiatrist Poul Thorsen, who had been a CDC visiting scientist in 1990.
At Thorsen’s recommendation, Simpson recruited Kresten Madsen, a doctoral candidate, who was listed as the lead author on several pivotal Danish studies. However, the principal scientist who co-authored those studies was, in fact, Thorsen.
Beyond the continued influence of fraudulent CDC and CDC-sponsored Danish epidemiological studies, Thorsen was a participant in a pivotal Working Group of the American Psychiatric Association (APA), which led to the controversial re-defining of the criteria for an autism diagnosis in the DSM-5, psychiatry’s diagnostic “bible”; the new DSM-5 criteria reduced the autism prevalence rate substantially.
All of the above are the legacy of the unholy marriage a long time ago between the highest echelons of CDC officials, wrong scientists, doctors, and pharmaceutical industry united in common purpose for the sake of combatting population growth under the cover of plausible deniability and spreading diseases for profits.
So long as population control and evoking pandemics are pursued in secret by the highest authorities rather than openly by the people themselves, periodic mass killings seem to be necessary this way compensate for the incomplete success of the more humane methods of population control.
We think to bring this criminal behavior to a halt draconian laws are needed and new prisons have to be built to housing thousands of scientific and authoritative criminals in order to re-educate them.
Not only the Ebola and HIV outbreak in West Africa, which are other man-made pandemics, targets a region of the world that has never seen Ebola but has the highest fertility rates in the world, the result of which the population grows at a whopping 4% annual rate.
The fear of infection and dying from Ebola gives the depopulation lobby the ammunition needed to accomplish two population control objectives: compel Africans to practice safe sex and use the newly created Ebola vaccine to purportedly immunize all males and females of childbearing age.
While at the same time sterilizing them for the moral basis for genocide and absolves the people and institutions responsible for instituting a system of mass murder. In fact, the responsibility for the genocide of people who have a direct or indirect hand in it will face the truth and justice one day.